Taylor Cowey

Vice President

B.A., American University

(203) 848-7720
taylor@wynnehealth.com

Taylor Cowey joined the Wynne Health Group at its founding after two years in the health policy practice of a respected boutique government relations firm based in Washington, D.C. There she developed extensive policy acumen in the federal legislative and regulatory issues that impact a diverse array of stakeholders in the healthcare space. Taylor brings unique expertise in Medicaid policy, state innovation waivers, hospital and provider issues, and the health of women and children.

Prior to joining the Wynne Health Group, Taylor specialized in women’s reproductive health and justice in positions at the National Abortion Federation Hotline Fund and the National Partnership for Women and Families. These experiences afforded a deep understanding of the social determinants and disparities that impact our health and the way we access care – a concept that she strives to carry through in her policy work.

Taylor holds a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology from American University in Washington, D.C., where she had the privilege to lead student delegations to Nepal and India to investigate women’s health in the context of the caste system and the Tibetan Diaspora. She lives in Seattle, Washington.

Proposed Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Reforms Aim To Facilitate Value-Based Care

On Wednesday, October 9, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced highly anticipated proposed reforms to current regulations implementing the Physician Self-Referral Law (the Stark Law) and the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). Also addressed were related civil monetary penalties (CMPs) for inducements to beneficiaries to utilize services. HHS identified the regulations as they stand now as potential impediments to value-based purchasing arrangements for providers and suppliers participating in federal health care programs, as well as in the commercial sector....
+ Read More

White House Requires Immigrants to Purchase Health Insurance

California Health Care Foundation Logo
On Friday, October 4, 2019, President Trump issued a proclamation to suspend entry of immigrants into the United States if they cannot prove that they will obtain unsubsidized health insurance coverage within 30 days of entering, or that they have the financial means to pay for any foreseeable health care costs (fact sheet). The proclamation is not yet in effect, and we anticipate legal challenges....
+ Read More

A Single Public Plan Option Versus A Multiplan Approach: A Colorado Case Study

Colorado and Washington State are in the process of implementing public option programs. Other states continue to explore similar actions as well as a variety of Medicaid buy-in proposals. A core consideration states implementing these programs face is whether to allow multiple public option plans (potentially offered by multiple carriers) to any given consumer or just a single public option plan. In both forerunner states and presumably those to follow, policy makers are charged with striking a delicate balance between maximizing affordability and maintaining market stability, including in their exchanges, where such plans are likely to be offered. ...
+ Read More

Medicare for All: What it Means, and Where it’s Headed

Medicare for All is the titular banner carrying the promise of comprehensive healthcare coverage for every U.S. resident and, along with it, reduced costs, improved quality, and patient-focused care. While phrases like “universal coverage” and “single-payer” have traditionally been reserved to the fringe of American politics, the idea of a single, government-run insurance plan is now taking center stage. But what does it really entail? And can we reasonably expect its fruition? We seek to provide some clarity on both questions. ...
+ Read More

The Final Public Charge Rule Is Out. Here’s How It Affects Immigrants.

California-Health-Care-Foundation1-400x200
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has finalized significant new restrictions to reduce immigration by creating a preference for wealthy, English-speaking, insured, and educated immigrants and putting up new hurdles for impoverished immigrants and their families....
+ Read More

Accelerating Primary Care Redesign: CMS’ Innovation Center Announces Five New Transformative Models

On April 22, 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the Primary Cares Initiative (PCI), a suite of five voluntary payment models aimed at overhauling primary care. Marking the Trump Administration’s latest investment in Medicare value-based reform, PCI focuses on the role of primary care providers as the central coordinators of patient health, with the goal of enhancing patient care while lowering overall Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) costs. Once implemented, CMS estimates that more than a quarter of all Medicare FFS beneficiaries – nearly 11 million individuals – will be included in these transformative primary care delivery models....
+ Read More

A Tell-All on Telehealth: Where Is Congress Heading Next?

Commonwealth-Fund 400x200
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently enacted modest but important expansions in Medicare’s telehealth policy. Telehealth, which uses telecommunications to support virtual health care delivery to improve access to and quality of health care, is moving from promise to reality. The benefits are appealing: Patients can interact with their providers remotely, which improves access to care and can help providers manage chronic conditions from afar....
+ Read More

Medicare Direct, A Blueprint For Public Option Waivers, Part 1: Introduction, Administration, And Financing

There is a reason that Medicare for All has captured the enthusiastic support of a large majority of the public: The status quo for our health care system is unsustainable economically and unforgiveable morally. An honest assessment of the probability of Congress enacting Medicare for All–related legislation, however, demonstrates it is highly unlikely in the foreseeable future. ...
+ Read More

Medicare Direct, A Blueprint For Public Option Waivers, Part 2: Benefit Design, Provider Networks, And Reimbursement

In all of the discussion and debate regarding Medicare for All and public option proposals, three essential considerations often get short shrift: the benefits enrollees will receive, the network of providers they will have access to; and the rates providers will be paid for delivering these services. These elements, however, really are the guts of any meaningful initiative of this scope. ...
+ Read More

Medicare Direct, A Blueprint For Public Option Waivers, Part 3: Waiver Design, Legal Authority, And Conclusion

Perhaps the greatest weakness of the Medicare for All, Medicare for More, and public option proposals issued thus far is the fact that they require Congress to pass new legislation. That is certainly true for Medicare for All, it’s true for a Medicare buy-in, and it’s likely true for federally run public options. The biggest strength of Medicare Direct, by contrast, is that it requires no such action. ...
+ Read More